New Delhi: The construction of North India’s first nuclear power plant in Haryana’s Gorakhpur is moving forward despite ongoing debates over environmental and safety concerns.
Union Minister of State (Independent Charge) Science & Technology, Dr Jitendra Singh recently confirmed the government’s commitment to the project while responding to concerns raised in the Lok Sabha.
Environmental Clearance and Safety Concerns
The Gorakhpur Nuclear Power Project has been under scrutiny, with its environmental clearance currently under renewal. The clearance, which expired in December 2022, lapsed due to procedural delays rather than new objections, according to Dr Singh.
He reiterated that government-backed studies have found no significant risks to marine life, fisheries, or nearby communities. Conservation groups, however, remain sceptical, pointing to the project’s location in a seismic zone.
Jaitapur Nuclear Project’s Role in India’s Energy Plans
Alongside the Haryana project, the government is advancing the Jaitapur Nuclear Power Plant in Maharashtra, which is set to be India’s largest nuclear energy facility.
The plant will have six reactors with a combined capacity of 10,380 MW, contributing 10 per cent of India’s targeted 100 GW nuclear power generation by 2047.
The project has faced delays due to changes in agreements with French stakeholders, but technical terms have been finalized, and commercial discussions are ongoing.
Nuclear Liability and Private Sector Involvement
Dr Singh addressed concerns about nuclear liability, stating that India’s Civil Liability for Nuclear Damage (CLND) framework ensures financial protection. An insurance pool of Rs 1,500 crore has been established, with government backing for additional coverage if required.
In a policy shift, the government is also opening the nuclear energy sector to private companies, aiming to accelerate nuclear expansion. The Gorakhpur project marks a step in this direction as India moves toward its net-zero emissions target by 2070.
While the government pushes forward, questions about safety, environmental impact, and regulatory processes remain key areas of public and expert scrutiny.
